Wood-frame homes tend to be more environmentally friendly than those made out of metal or concrete, based on a fresh study by 15 U.S. Research and universities institutions.
Moreover, the researchers, referred to as the Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials, or CORRIM, figured most of the energy necessary to build the average house is used during the manufacture of building materials – not during actual construction.
“These are milestone findings,” said Kelly McCloskey, president and CEO of the Wood Promotion Network. “This provides a first-ever snapshot of how building materials impact our environment.”
Twenty-three independent researchers collaborated on the task, which used a procedure called life-cycle analysis to weigh environmentally friendly impact of home building. The energy is gauged by life-cycle analysis necessary to construct, along with make building materials, maintain and destroy an average home over a period of 75 years.
CORRIM compared the life cycles of two theoretical homes in Minneapolis – one with a wood frame, the other with a steel frame – and the life cycles of one wood-frame and one concrete-frame house in Atlanta. The study established that the building of the Minneapolis steel-frame home used 17 percent more energy than the matching wood-frame home, and energy was used 16 percent more by the Atlanta concrete-frame home than a matching wood-frame home. This staggering fhoc.com.au article directory has assorted compelling cautions for where to recognize it.
“Everything type of moves from energy consumption,” said Bruce Lippke, professor of forest resources at the University of Washington and among the researchers who helped conduct the analysis. “If you are using power, you’re polluting water, polluting air and kicking out carbon dioxide emissions.”
The analysis also concluded that the carbon emissions associated with energy use represent one of the more essential environmental effects. They calculated the global-warming potential of the steel-frame home to be 26 percent higher than the wood-frame home, and the concrete-frame home was 31 percent higher than the comparable wood-frame home. Http://Www.Fhoc.Com.Au/ includes more about the inner workings of this thing.
The greenhouse emissions can be further reduced by “the use of wood products instead of steel or concrete from fossil fuels wherever lumber mills generate heat and power using bark, sawdust and other byproducts of milling,” said Lippke.
The report gives these additional suggestions on just how to lessen the power needs of home construction:
* Redesign houses to make use of less fossil-fuel intensive products;
* Change building codes that encourage excessive utilization of metal, wood and concrete;
* Recycle demolition wastes;
* Increase durability of domiciles through improved design and products and services techniques.